Исходное сообщение
"Первый стабильный выпуск рабочего стола Lumina" Отправлено Аноним, 09-Авг-16 13:56
> Почему-то они все гораздо удобнее > но кого-то одолел NIH-синдром. Да нет, просто благодаря Леннарту Великолепному пошла мода прибивать ДЕ к пингвину и системд такими гвоздями, что проще написать еще один ДЕ, чем каждый раз ковырятся, портируя. https://blog.pcbsd.org/2014/04/quick-lumina-desktop-faq/ > Why create a new desktop environment? Whats wrong with KDE/GNOME/XFCE/<other>? > (4-a) Porting time > Since the DE’s are written on/for linux, they have to be ported over to BSD, and this introduces a (sometimes significant) time-delay before updated versions are available > (4-c) Linux development trends > As Linux trends continue to diverge from BSD through reliance on Linux kernel functions or Linux-specific systems/daemons, the porting process over to BSD is going to get even more > difficult and take longer to accomplish. This means that if we want to have a reliable/stable desktop on BSD going forward, we have to have one designed specifically for the BSD’s. > (4-d) Linux dependency bloat. > If you look at current DE dependency lists, it is easy to see that when you install a desktop, you might be getting a lot more than you bargained for (such as additional compilers/programming languages, network libraries/daemons, audio/video daemons/applications, etc).

Ваше сообщение
Имя*:
EMail:	Для отправки ответов на email укажите знак ! перед адресом, например, !user@host.ru (!! - не показывать email). Более тонкая настройка отправки ответов производится в профиле зарегистрированного участника форума.
Заголовок*:
Сообщение*:	>> Почему-то они все гораздо удобнее >> но кого-то одолел NIH-синдром. > Да нет, просто благодаря Леннарту Великолепному пошла мода прибивать ДЕ к пингвину > и системд такими гвоздями, что проще написать еще один ДЕ, чем > каждый раз ковырятся, портируя. > https://blog.pcbsd.org/2014/04/quick-lumina-desktop-faq/ >> Why create a new desktop environment? Whats wrong with KDE/GNOME/XFCE/<other>? >> (4-a) Porting time >> Since the DE’s are written on/for linux, they have to be ported over to BSD, and this introduces a (sometimes significant) time-delay before updated versions are available >> (4-c) Linux development trends >> As Linux trends continue to diverge from BSD through reliance on Linux kernel functions or Linux-specific systems/daemons, the porting process over to BSD is going to get even more >> difficult and take longer to accomplish. This means that if we want to have a reliable/stable desktop on BSD going forward, we have to have one designed specifically for the BSD’s. >> (4-d) Linux dependency bloat. >> If you look at current DE dependency lists, it is easy to see that when you install a desktop, you might be getting a lot more than you bargained for (such as additional compilers/programming languages, network libraries/daemons, audio/video daemons/applications, etc).
	Введите код, изображенный на картинке: