> Почитал комменарии. Из всех комментаторов (включая автора новости) только один аноним озадачился,
> - а нужен ли самому Github (равно как и его аналогам) Ну дык. А еще никто не озадачился посмотреть, сколько изменений за эти полтора года были внесены и что вынесенно/вычеркнуто:
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CONSI...
например, там нет исходного требования "распознавания" контента, добавлены некоторые пункты защиты и вообще, частично вроде бы не сильно отличаются от "еще более западного" аналога:
> including in particular those which guarantee their freedom of expression and access to information. For that purpose, the service provider shall put in place a complaint and redress mechanism that is available to users of the service in case of disputes over the implementation of the measures. Complaints submitted under this mechanism shall be processed by the relevant rightholders within a reasonable period of time. The rightholder shall duly justify its decision.
.
> For that purpose the service providers should put in place mechanisms allowing users to complain about the blocking or removal of uploaded content that could benefit from an exception or limitation to copyright.
> Replies to the users’ complaints should be provided in a timely manner. To make these mechanisms function,
> cooperation from rightholders is needed, in particular with regard to the assessment of the
> complaints submitted and justifications for the prevention. The redress mechanism will be without prejudice to the right of the parties to take action before a court.
.
> The level of information given by the service providers should as a minimum be sufficient to allow rightholders to assess the effectiveness of the measures used without requiring the service providers to provide them with detailed and individualised information for each content identified.
В общем, там все заново читать (и переводить с крючкотворно-юридического на "человеческий") нужно.
