The OpenNET Project / Index page

[ новости /+++ | форум | теги | ]

Интерактивная система просмотра системных руководств (man-ов)

 ТемаНаборКатегория 
 
 [Cписок руководств | Печать]

cpc_bind_event (3)
  • >> cpc_bind_event (3) ( Solaris man: Библиотечные вызовы )
  •  

    NAME

    cpc_bind_event, cpc_take_sample, cpc_rele - use CPU performance counters on lwps
     
    

    SYNOPSIS

    cc [ flag... ] file... -lcpc [ library... ]
    #include <libcpc.h>
    
    int cpc_bind_event(cpc_event_t *event, int flags);
    

    int cpc_take_sample(cpc_event_t *event);
    

    int cpc_rele(void);
    

     

    DESCRIPTION

    Once the events to be sampled have been selected using, for example, cpc_strtoevent(3CPC), the event selections can be bound to the calling LWP using cpc_bind_event(). If cpc_bind_event() returns successfully, the system has associated performance counter context with the calling LWP. The context allows the system to virtualize the hardware counters to that specific LWP, and the counters are enabled.

    Two flags are defined that can be passed into the routine to allow the behavior of the interface to be modified, as described below.

    Counter values can be sampled at any time by calling cpc_take_sample(), and dereferencing the fields of the ce_pic[] array returned. The ce_hrt field contains the timestamp at which the kernel last sampled the counters.

    To immediately remove the performance counter context on an LWP, the cpc_rele() interface should be used. Otherwise, the context will be destroyed after the LWP or process exits.

    The caller should take steps to ensure that the counters are sampled often enough to avoid the 32-bit counters wrapping. The events most prone to wrap are those that count processor clock cycles. If such an event is of interest, sampling should occur frequently so that less than 4 billion clock cycles can occur between samples. Practically speaking, this is only likely to be a problem for otherwise idle systems, or when processes are bound to processors, since normal context switching behavior will otherwise hide this problem.  

    RETURN VALUES

    Upon successful completion, cpc_bind_event() and cpc_take_sample() return 0. Otherwise, these functions return -1, and set errno to indicate the error.  

    ERRORS

    The cpc_bind_event() and cpc_take_sample() functions will fail if:

    EACCES

    For cpc_bind_event(), access to the requested hypervisor event was denied.

    EAGAIN

    Another process may be sampling system-wide CPU statistics. For cpc_bind_event(), this implies that no new contexts can be created. For cpc_take_sample(), this implies that the performance counter context has been invalidated and must be released with cpc_rele(). Robust programs should be coded to expect this behavior and recover from it by releasing the now invalid context by calling cpc_rele() sleeping for a while, then attempting to bind and sample the event once more.

    EINVAL

    The cpc_take_sample() function has been invoked before the context is bound.

    ENOTSUP

    The caller has attempted an operation that is illegal or not supported on the current platform, such as attempting to specify signal delivery on counter overflow on a CPU that doesn't generate an interrupt on counter overflow.

     

    USAGE

    Prior to calling cpc_bind_event(), applications should call cpc_access(3CPC) to determine if the counters are accessible on the system.  

    EXAMPLES

    Example 1 Use hardware performance counters to measure events in a process.

    The example below shows how a standalone program can be instrumented with the libcpc routines to use hardware performance counters to measure events in a process. The program performs 20 iterations of a computation, measuring the counter values for each iteration. By default, the example makes the counters measure external cache references and external cache hits; these options are only appropriate for UltraSPARC processors. By setting the PERFEVENTS environment variable to other strings (a list of which can be gleaned from the -h flag of the cpustat or cputrack utilities), other events can be counted. The error() routine below is assumed to be a user-provided routine analogous to the familiar printf(3C) routine from the C library but which also performs an exit(2) after printing the message.

    #include <inttypes.h>
    #include <stdlib.h>
    #include <stdio.h>
    #include <unistd.h>
    #include <libcpc.h>
    int
    main(int argc, char *argv[])
    {
    int cpuver, iter;
    char *setting = NULL;
    cpc_event_t event;
    
    if (cpc_version(CPC_VER_CURRENT) != CPC_VER_CURRENT)
       error("application:library cpc version mismatch!");
    
    if ((cpuver = cpc_getcpuver()) == -1)
       error("no performance counter hardware!");
    
    if ((setting = getenv("PERFEVENTS")) == NULL)
       setting = "pic0=EC_ref,pic1=EC_hit";
    
    if (cpc_strtoevent(cpuver, setting, &event) != 0)
       error("can't measure '%s' on this processor", setting);
    setting = cpc_eventtostr(&event);
    
    if (cpc_access() == -1)
       error("can't access perf counters: %s", strerror(errno));
    
    if (cpc_bind_event(&event, 0) == -1)
       error("can't bind lwp%d: %s", _lwp_self(), strerror(errno));
    
    for (iter = 1; iter <= 20; iter++) {
       cpc_event_t before, after;
    
       if (cpc_take_sample(&before) == -1)
           break;
    
       /* ==> Computation to be measured goes here <== */
    
       if (cpc_take_sample(&after) == -1)
           break;
       (void) printf("%3d: %" PRId64 " %" PRId64 ", iter,
           after.ce_pic[0] - before.ce_pic[0],
           after.ce_pic[1] - before.ce_pic[1]);
    }
    
    if (iter != 20)
       error("can't sample '%s': %s", setting,    strerror(errno)); 
    
    free(setting);
    return (0);
    }
    

    Example 2 Write a signal handler to catch overflow signals.

    This example builds on Example 1, but demonstrates how to write the signal handler to catch overflow signals. The counters are preset so that counter zero is 1000 counts short of overflowing, while counter one is set to zero. After 1000 counts on counter zero, the signal handler will be invoked.

    First the signal handler:

    #define PRESET0        (UINT64_MAX - UINT64_C(999))
    #define PRESET1        0
    
    void
    emt_handler(int sig, siginfo_t *sip, void *arg)
    {
    ucontext_t *uap = arg;
    cpc_event_t sample;
    
    if (sig != SIGEMT || sip->si_code != EMT_CPCOVF) {
       psignal(sig, "example");
       psiginfo(sip, "example");
       return;
    }
    
    (void) printf("lwp%d - si_addr %p ucontext: %%pc %p %%sp %p,
       _lwp_self(), (void *)sip->si_addr,
       (void *)uap->uc_mcontext.gregs[PC],
       (void *)uap->uc_mcontext.gregs[USP]);
    
    if (cpc_take_sample(&sample) == -1)
       error("can't sample: %s", strerror(errno));
    
    (void) printf("0x%" PRIx64 " 0x%" PRIx64 ",
       sample.ce_pic[0], sample.ce_pic[1]);
    (void) fflush(stdout);
    
    sample.ce_pic[0] = PRESET0;
    sample.ce_pic[1] = PRESET1;
    if (cpc_bind_event(&sample, CPC_BIND_EMT_OVF) == -1)
       error("cannot bind lwp%d: %s", _lwp_self(), strerror(errno));
    }
    

    and second the setup code (this can be placed after the code that selects the event to be measured):

    struct sigaction act;
    cpc_event_t event;
    ...
    act.sa_sigaction = emt_handler;
    bzero(&act.sa_mask, sizeof (act.sa_mask));
    act.sa_flags = SA_RESTART|SA_SIGINFO;
    if (sigaction(SIGEMT, &act, NULL) == -1)
       error("sigaction: %s", strerror(errno));
    event.ce_pic[0] = PRESET0;
    event.ce_pic[1] = PRESET1;
    if (cpc_bind_event(&event, CPC_BIND_EMT_OVF) == -1)
       error("cannot bind lwp%d: %s", _lwp_self(), strerror(errno));
    
    for (iter = 1; iter <= 20; iter++) {
       /* ==> Computation to be measured goes here <== */
    }
    
    cpc_bind_event(NULL, 0);    /* done */
    

    Note that a more general version of the signal handler would use write(2) directly instead of depending on the signal-unsafe semantics of stderr and stdout. Most real signal handlers will probably do more with the samples than just print them out.

     

    ATTRIBUTES

    See attributes(5) for descriptions of the following attributes:

    ATTRIBUTE TYPEATTRIBUTE VALUE

    MT-LevelMT-Safe

    Interface Stability

     

    SEE ALSO

    cpustat(1M), cputrack(1), write(2). cpc(3CPC), cpc_access(3CPC), cpc_bind_curlwp(3CPC), cpc_set_sample(3CPC), cpc_strtoevent(3CPC), cpc_unbind(3CPC), libcpc(3LIB), attributes(5)  

    NOTES

    The cpc_bind_event(), cpc_take_sample(), and cpc_rele() functions exist for binary compatibility only. Source containing these functions will not compile. These functions are obsolete and might be removed in a future release. Applications should use cpc_bind_curlwp(3CPC), cpc_set_sample(3CPC), and cpc_unbind(3CPC) instead.

    Sometimes, even the overhead of performing a system call will be too disruptive to the events being measured. Once a call to cpc_bind_event() has been issued, it is possible to directly access the performance hardware registers from within the application. If the performance counter context is active, then the counters will count on behalf of the current LWP.  

    SPARC

    rd %pic, %rN        ! All UltraSPARC
    wr %rN, %pic        ! (ditto, but see text)
    

     

    x86

    rdpmc               ! Pentium II only
    

    If the counter context is not active or has been invalidated, the %pic register (SPARC), and the rdpmc instruction (Pentium) will become unavailable.

    Note that the two 32-bit UltraSPARC performance counters are kept in the single 64-bit %pic register so a couple of additional instructions are required to separate the values. Also note that when the %pcr register bit has been set that configures the %pic register as readable by an application, it is also writable. Any values written will be preserved by the context switching mechanism.

    Pentium II processors support the non-privileged rdpmc instruction which requires [5] that the counter of interest be specified in %ecx, and returns a 40-bit value in the %edx:%eax register pair. There is no non-privileged access mechanism for Pentium I processors.  

    Handling counter overflow

    As described above, when counting events, some processors allow their counter registers to silently overflow. More recent CPUs such as UltraSPARC III and Pentium II, however, are capable of generating an interrupt when the hardware counter overflows. Some processors offer more control over when interrupts will actually be generated. For example, they might allow the interrupt to be programmed to occur when only one of the counters overflows. See cpc_strtoevent(3CPC) for the syntax.

    The most obvious use for this facility is to ensure that the full 64-bit counter values are maintained without repeated sampling. However, current hardware does not record which counter overflowed. A more subtle use for this facility is to preset the counter to a value to a little less than the maximum value, then use the resulting interrupt to catch the counter overflow associated with that event. The overflow can then be used as an indication of the frequency of the occurrence of that event.

    Note that the interrupt generated by the processor may not be particularly precise. That is, the particular instruction that caused the counter overflow may be earlier in the instruction stream than is indicated by the program counter value in the ucontext.

    When cpc_bind_event() is called with the CPC_BIND_EMT_OVF flag set, then as before, the control registers and counters are preset from the 64-bit values contained in event. However, when the flag is set, the kernel arranges to send the calling process a SIGEMT signal when the overflow occurs, with the si_code field of the corresponding siginfo structure set to EMT_CPCOVF, and the si_addr field is the program counter value at the time the overflow interrupt was delivered. Counting is disabled until the next call to cpc_bind_event(). Even in a multithreaded process, during execution of the signal handler, the thread behaves as if it is temporarily bound to the running LWP.

    Different processors have different counter ranges available, though all processors supported by Solaris allow at least 31 bits to be specified as a counter preset value; thus portable preset values lie in the range UINT64_MAX to UINT64_MAX-INT32_MAX.

    The appropriate preset value will often need to be determined experimentally. Typically, it will depend on the event being measured, as well as the desire to minimize the impact of the act of measurement on the event being measured; less frequent interrupts and samples lead to less perturbation of the system.

    If the processor cannot detect counter overflow, this call will fail (ENOTSUP). Specifying a null event unbinds the context from the underlying LWP and disables signal delivery. Currently, only user events can be measured using this technique. See Example 2, above.  

    Inheriting events onto multiple LWPs

    By default, the library binds the performance counter context to the current LWP only. If the CPC_BIND_LWP_INHERIT flag is set, then any subsequent LWPs created by that LWP will automatically inherit the same performance counter context. The counters will be initialized to 0 as if a cpc_bind_event() had just been issued. This automatic inheritance behavior can be useful when dealing with multithreaded programs to determine aggregate statistics for the program as a whole.

    If the CPC_BIND_EMT_OVF flag is also set, the process will immediately dispatch a SIGEMT signal to the freshly created LWP so that it can preset its counters appropriately on the new LWP. This initialization condition can be detected using cpc_take_sample() to check that both ce_pic[] values are set to UINT64_MAX.


     

    Index

    NAME
    SYNOPSIS
    DESCRIPTION
    RETURN VALUES
    ERRORS
    USAGE
    EXAMPLES
    ATTRIBUTES
    SEE ALSO
    NOTES
    SPARC
    x86
    Handling counter overflow
    Inheriting events onto multiple LWPs


    Поиск по тексту MAN-ов: 




    Партнёры:
    PostgresPro
    Inferno Solutions
    Hosting by Hoster.ru
    Хостинг:

    Закладки на сайте
    Проследить за страницей
    Created 1996-2024 by Maxim Chirkov
    Добавить, Поддержать, Вебмастеру