Исходное сообщение
"Исследование проблем с производительностью JavaScript на моб..." Отправлено Аноним, 15-Июл-13 16:27
Интересный кусок: A Rust contributor weighs in: I’m a contributor to the Rust project, whose goal is zero-overhead memory safety. We support GC’d objects via “@-boxes” (the type declaration is “@T” for any type T), and one thing we have been struggling with recently is that GC touches everything in a language. If you want to support GC but not require it, you need to very carefully design your language to support zero-overhead non-GC’d pointers. It’s a very non-trivial problem, and I don’t think it can be solved by forking JS.

Ваше сообщение
Имя*:
EMail:	Для отправки ответов на email укажите знак ! перед адресом, например, !user@host.ru (!! - не показывать email). Более тонкая настройка отправки ответов производится в профиле зарегистрированного участника форума.
Заголовок*:
Сообщение*:	> Интересный кусок: > A Rust contributor weighs in: > I’m a contributor to the Rust project, whose goal is zero-overhead memory > safety. We support GC’d objects via “@-boxes” (the type declaration > is “@T” for any type T), and one thing we have > been struggling with recently is that GC touches everything in a > language. If you want to support GC but not require it, > you need to very carefully design your language to support zero-overhead > non-GC’d pointers. It’s a very non-trivial problem, and I don’t think > it can be solved by forking JS.
	Введите код, изображенный на картинке: